monster

...now browsing by tag

 
 

Selling Out in 2010

Monday, December 28th, 2009

 dumont pox brobomb

I’ve had a question on my mind for a little while now, and watching the Dew/Tostinos/NBC Tour brought it up over and over again. I doubt it’s something that bothers the youngest snow sports fans at all, as they’ve grown up in this world. But as someone with a clear memory of the latter 90’s and early part of our quickly-fading “00” decade, I can’t help but wonder what has changed. Do we live in a post-sellout world? Is there anything skiers, or any other action sports icons, could do that would constitute selling out?

It used to be such a hot topic in so many different areas. If a rapper sung his own hook, he had sold out. Or if some indie band signed with a major label and put out an album that sold more than ten copies, they definitely sold out. Now we’ve got Weezy and Kanye crooning through an Autotuner, and indie rock is the only thing with guitars that sells (new country doesn’t count).

shaun white pipe brobomb

Enough with the music analogy, so what would it require for a skier to be a sellout these days? Do we look to snowboarding for our cues on this one? I remember snowboarders lining up on different sides of the Olympics debate, and accusations of selling out the sport were thrown around. Now we’ve got Red Bull building Shaun White a pipe, and nobody bats an eye. If ski superpipe ever makes the Olympics, would there be any dissent in the ranks? The older generation might raise the old FIS killed freestyle argument, but would anyone in the current generation listen? How about sponsorships, is there a corporation so heinous that we’d scream “sellout” if a Dumont signed with them?

I’ve compiled a list of hypotheticals, you tell me if it’s even possible to be a sellout: 

-  Tom Wallisch admitted that he holds poles because the judges like it, but later he reveals that he will replace one pole with a can of Monster when he rides slopestyle.

-  Simon Dumont gets tiny red Target logos tattooed all over his face and claims it’s just a rare form of the chicken pox.

-  Tanner Hall promotes a line of dreadlock wigs in a series of daytime TV ads.

-  Orage brings back Siver, but the only jacket they produce is a black and gray fleece that is marketed to fraternities with the slogan “Respect the Of A Revolutionaries.”

-  Freeskier puts out the “Chevy Truck Month” Photo Annual with pics of Eric Pollard pulling his snowmobiles with a different truck on each page.

-  Jon Olsson was once called a sellout for signing with J. Lindeberg and wearing pink; what if he starts promoting a line of rustic home-goods for IKEA called “Yniqly Jon.”

-  Newschoolers starts banning posts that criticize its ad sponsors, and the “reviews” page is renamed the “Good Vibe Experience Journal.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Marketing Dumbographic

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

soap box

Plenty has been said about the recent lawsuits that have infiltrated our little corner of capitalism. Certain segments of the community have rallied around Level 1, and declared WME an evil corporate Goliath that is attacking a smaller rival in a way that violates all sorts of unwritten ski-community codes. For those of you reading from New England, you are supremely aware that a similar story is playing out as every freeskier’s favorite sponsor, Monster Energy Drink, is suing every eastern hippie’s favorite beer company for their Vermonster brew. These lawsuits are harshing mellows all over our world, and have inspired varying levels of ire aimed at “chanting down Bab-y-lon,” or whatever Cali-P taught Tanner to say this week.

Babylon aside, the corporate giants aren’t doing anything wrong. Not in the strict sense of capitalism anyhow. And, despite John Spriggs’ fantastic dreadlocks, skiing is as capitalist as Goldman Sachs. We buy cheaper skis made in China that can be shipped here due to free trade agreements, and demand high-speed lifts that only large corporations can afford. All the hardcore backcountry cats that wander over here from TGR are smugly disagreeing from the backs of their vans, but even mountaineering didn’t emerge until capitalism specialized our jobs and freed the masses from tending a farm somewhere.vermonster

What Monster and WME did was not wrong, but it was stupid. And I mean stupid in the capitalist sense. Their lawsuits have done nothing towards making a profit, but they have alienated segments of the population that otherwise would have been good indifferent consumers. When Level 1 asked Warren Miller to lend his voice to Refresh, it is unclear who would benefit more from the arrangement. It’s unlikely that anyone in Josh Berman’s target audience had purchased a Warren Miller brand film in the decade L1P has been in existence. Therefore, the voice that is still being digitally laid on top of WME films was introduced to an entirely new audience. It’s free advertising, and on top of that it is targeted directly at the most sought after demographic—young males.

The example of Rock Art Brewery’s Vermonster beer is slightly different. I doubt the use of “monster” in the name convinced any VT hippies to try out an energy drink. In Vermonster, we’re talking about a product targeted at the exact opposite market as the product for which it stands accused of impersonating. Microbrews exist in a land of yuppies with professional degrees and ideals. Energy drinks are for the uneducated masses that never learned what large amounts of sugar can do to your insides. But suddenly, Monster’s favorite fools are aware of Rock Art and their legal battle because sites like YoBeat and Ski the East have made them aware via YouTube videos that require no reading or attention span.

Will the multinational corporations be hurt when a park rat drinks a Vermonster rather than a Monster when he wants to get extreme on some grind rails? No. But millions of dollars are spent to create brand image, and these lawsuits are actually costing money to tarnish said image. It’s just dumb (in the capitalist sense).

  • Share/Bookmark